If there was ever any doubt about the doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan, it is erased in this discussion. Ramadan’s defence of the Turkish Islamists (now caught up in massive corruption scandals) as ‘progressive’ and his slick use of straw man arguments reveal the threat such snake oil charmers pose to Western Civilization. His defence of Sharia is sly and meant to lure his non-Muslim audience into a guilt trip, as if their opposition to such medievalism was racist. Hitchens on the other hand demonstrates clarity that is in such short supply today.
Featured Posts
Debate: Is Islam a Religion of Peace? Hitchens takes on Tariq Ramadan
by • • 3 Comments
Popular choices
- Casino Fiable En Ligne
- Migliori Casino Online
- Sites De Paris Sportifs Belgique
- Pari Sportif Belgique
- Meilleur Site Casino En Ligne Belgique
- Meilleur Site Casino En Ligne Belgique
- Siti Scommesse Non Aams Italiani
- Siti Casino Online Non Aams
- App Scommesse Sportive
- Bookmaker Crypto
- Meilleur Site De Paris Sportif International
- Sweet Bonanza Avis
- Paris Sportif Ufc France
- Nhà Cái Châu âu
- Meilleur Casino Sans Verification
- Meilleurs Sites Paris Sportifs
- Nouveau Casino En Ligne Fiable
- Casino En Ligne Nouveau
- Casino En Ligne 2026
- Crypto Scommesse
- Casino En Ligne
- Casino En Ligne France
- Casino En Ligne Retrait Rapide
- Casino En Ligne Avis
- Casino Non Aams Affidabile
- Free Spin Gratis Senza Deposito
- Siti Scommesse Sportive
- 메이저사이트

I wonder TF how do you find so much time to watch all these videos. In my case, It seems simply impossible for me!
He doesn’t say anything about “God is one and Mohammed is the last prophet” and whoever does not accept this is a kafir. They have declared Ahmadias as non-Muslims and also the Bahais as non-Muslim antagonists. Then who is Muslim? Only this man and Tarek Fatah?
This Tariq is in effect saying the European principles are better and model and the Islamic majority countries are groaning under dictatorship, etc. So in effect he agrees that Islamic countries as such are not role models and the ideal is European democracies which is in essence secular and not religious at all. So the logical conclusion of his own arguments is that Islam as a religion has failed to imbibe or promote democratic values.